 | odin426 (393 posts) 11/1/2012 10:07 PM |
Just read a chat transcript of Aaron Bruski and he said to trade Kaman for Mullens, for real? Really? Mullens that good or Caveman that bad? Thanks guys
100% Agree (1 vote) |
 | mbuser (4322 posts) 11/1/2012 11:51 PM |
It's subjective is what it is, but let's just assume his reasoning is that he doesn't expect Kaman to stay healthy. Lots of ardent "Mullens is going to go nuts" folks, though.
0% Agree (0 votes) |
| odin426 (393 posts) 11/1/2012 11:58 PM |
Talent wise Kaman is still better? I also have Brand so he can be a handcuff to Kaman right? If he goes down he should put up big numbers and if hes there he shoud still be servicable right?
0% Agree (0 votes) |
| mbuser (4322 posts) 11/2/2012 12:04 AM |
Kaman will be a better fantasy player when he's healthy, no doubt. And that is one of the few situations where a handcuff isn't a bad idea, because Brand will have good value even when Kaman/Dirk are playing.
0% Agree (0 votes) |
| odin426 (393 posts) 11/2/2012 12:28 AM |
Phew thanks Matt, thought there was something about Mullens that I couldnt see....(maybe there still is hahahahahaha)
0% Agree (0 votes) |
| mbuser (4322 posts) 11/2/2012 12:39 AM |
Like I said, there are plenty of people out there who think Mullens is in for a huge fantasy season, based on what they saw in the preseason. Dr.A took him with pick 85 in one league I'm in with him  I'm on the low end when it comes to season-long projections, although I'm completely in favor of rostering him while we see how things play out. He just never made it to where I would draft him once the hype was rolling.
0% Agree (0 votes) |
| odin426 (393 posts) 11/2/2012 12:44 AM |
Oh ok, what do you see as his floor though?
0% Agree (0 votes) |