scottkimberly (100 posts)  12/5/2012 1:59 AM

Noticed that his projections were marked down a shade.  Not sure on specifically what numbers were cut, but is 17/10 with solid percentages out of the question?  He may also chip in 3 assists or so.

mbuser (4333 posts)  12/5/2012 11:55 AM

Not out of the question at all, particularly if he can get that funky FT% corrected.

scottkimberly (100 posts)  12/5/2012 1:30 PM

I bought Horford as a big who shoots free throws well (desperately going after Noah for similar reasons--- hustler who won't kill FT).  Horford promptly shot 1-10 from the line.  Fantastic.

DMWave (171 posts)  12/15/2012 7:54 PM

I figured Horford would turn around this FT shooting quickly as he's never shot below 72% for the year but 3 for 6 tonight again. He's been a beast besides that FT%...

ZeroStatic (164 posts)  12/15/2012 7:56 PM

It's real unfortunate because apart from his FT% his game this season has been incredible.

odin426 (393 posts)  1/24/2013 4:18 AM

How serious do you guys see his latest injury?

brandonislegend (115 posts)  1/24/2013 2:22 PM

I swapped Horford for Marc Gasol 

mbuser (4333 posts)  1/24/2013 2:34 PM

The hamstring/calf has been bothering him for about two weeks, but it wasn't enough for him to sit previously. Obviously worth monitoring, but there's been no indication that it's a serious injury, more just some lingering stuff.

odin426 (393 posts)  1/24/2013 10:28 PM

Thanks Matt, should I keep Johnson on my bench just in case or pounce on Darrell Arthur?

mbuser (4333 posts)  1/25/2013 1:11 PM

Arthur is likely to be a more regular piece of his team's rotation, so pounce away.

CalvinJ55 (3 posts)  2/11/2013 11:13 AM

Would a Josh Smith trade have much effect on Horford?

mbuser (4333 posts)  2/11/2013 12:16 PM

Smith leads the Hawks in usage by a comfortable margin, so Horford would see an uptick there, but Smith's replacement won't match his AST%, so you have to think of that as a negative. It's not likely to move his impact up/down much, but I'd think it'd be a positive (+usage) before a negative (-efficiency).