These guys are dropping off but still have a lot of value if drafted in the right place. I was thinking about pick 55 for Garnett and maybe 70 for Duncan. Thoughts?
0% Agree (0 votes) |
I would (and have) picked up KG a decent bit earlier than that, I'd even consider picking him any time after pick 35 or so. He was top 15 in per game value last year. He was even better (11th I think) in per game value after he moved to starting C, which is where he will be starting again. Doc has just recently come out and said that he does not plan to limit KG's minutes any more than he did last year (so 31-32 mpg again). I just don't see much downside to a KG pick in the late 30s or 40s. If you can get him at pick 55, more power to you.
Duncan at around 65-70 is reasonable imo.
100% Agree (4 votes) |
Garnett shows a lot more promise for the year than Duncan does. Duncan is clearly on the downslope, and Pop has made adjustments to limit his minutes so Duncan can make it through the year and give them a boost in the playoffs. Garnett seems to be sustaining value, and while he isn't elite anymore, he is still in great shape and is in line for significant minutes and a reliable stat line. I like Garnett in the 35-45 range, and Duncan around 70-80.
0% Agree (0 votes) |
KG's playoff schedule is great and he's always undervalued; I'm def. targeting him although he's not a "sexy" pick. I usually avoid Duncan, due to him being benched/rested, but will take him if he falls deep.
0% Agree (0 votes) |