Jusuf Nurkic - POR - C

 Open Historical Profile
TeamPOR
Age22
Draft2014 (Pick 16)
NBA Salary$1,921,320
Projection Updated3/26/2017

Related Articles (19)

39.8d ago Open link
Playing Playing Wednesday @UTA (traded)
He'll make his Blazers debut Wednesday.
41.9d ago Open link
Traded Traded (from den)
Nurkic was traded to Portland from Denver along with a 1st round pick (Memphis' pick). Portland gives Mason Plumlee and a 2nd round pick.
77.7d ago Open link
Starting Starting Saturday @OKC
Nurkic is starting Saturday at OKC in place of Nikola Jokic (illness).
16.0d
jrblack317
100% (2) agree 
Yeah I'm not sure I understand that particular trade from the Nuggets perspective. Seems like they got fleeced. I wish my Bucks would have offered something for Nurkic.
16.1d
gehrenberg
100% (7) agree 
So Nurkic and a first round pick for Plumlee...
16.4d
Martiaci
100% (2) agree 
Hey Josh, how about bumping his assists a bit?
16.4d
zass17
100% (2) agree 
There is no question that he is a game changer.
16.5d
xer09
100% (6) agree 
NURK-LER LAUNCH DETECTED!! WHOOOOOOOOOO!
16.5d
joshlloyd48
100% (3) agree 
We have 8 games of him over 70% and 44 games of him under 60%. I've given him a bit of a bump, but i'd like to see more than 8 games before i consider him a 75% shooter from the line
16.5d
#19032
100% (2) agree 
Holy Nurkness
16.5d
rka28
100% (1) agree 
NURK ALERT! He learned a lot from Jokic haha
16.5d
genes1s88
100% (1) agree 
obligatory nurk alert.
16.6d
chenkyte
100% (1) agree 
5 blocks in just 7 mins, loving that
23.1d
iamandres
50% (2) agree 
@Se2b love that nick name! The Bosnian Boogie! Got him on the wire after he was traded, haven't looked back since. Fits my team supremely well. Steals, Blocks, FG, Rbds and I punt FT but he hasnt been as bad as people say, he shoots low volume FT...not that it matters for my team. :)
23.4d
se2b
67% (3) agree 
Is this guy really a poor FT shooter? Update the bosnian boogie!
23.4d
#19032
It's amazing what confidence can do.
23.4d
patek2301
100% (1) agree 
My Goodness. Do you see him being a consistent double2 guy with decent ft%?
24.0d
jhiller
100% (6) agree 
Couple hours before the trade deadline, need some input. UP for Jeff Teague or DOWN for Nurkic+Favors. Need assists so this would help a lot
30.1d
#27156
100% (2) agree 
Nurk over Kanter since Taj is joining the party
30.4d
kylemckeown16
I'd absolutely take Nurkic's upside over Kanter as long as you can take Nurkic's poor ft% and turnovers.
30.4d
leggemg.fantasy
80% (10) agree 
Up: Nurkic, Down: Kanter
30.5d
joshlloyd48
He should be an easy add
30.6d
#64830
100% (6) agree 
Are we re-tweeking projections here? He plays 5 games in my first playoff matchup. Would like to know if he's an add. Up Nurk, Down TJ Warren.
30.6d
NBAisRigged
0% (4) agree 
Up: Nurkic Down: Gorgui
30.6d
Kemstar21
100% (6) agree 
#Newlife
30.7d
charlie_brown102
90% (10) agree 
uh oh, sound the nurk alert!
38.0d
#39100
0% (2) agree 
Running an efficiency team (FG/FT/TO) team in H2H. Nurk was too good to leave on the wire but he hurts me in my strong categories. Should I still keep him or swap him out for another low-end C like Robin Lopez or Zubac?
39.8d
funtasy
giving him a few games to ease into the system before the 5-game week, woohoooo
39.8d
kylemckeown16
100% (2) agree 
Stotts said Nurkic will play Wednesday. I'm excited to watch the Bosnian Boogie play with Dame and CJ. Here's hoping he plays well and Stotts gives him a ton of minutes the rest of the way.
40.3d
heyghost
71% (7) agree 
14 team H2H, 9 cat Nurkic (UP) or Juan Hernangomez (DOWN)
41.0d
trk93
100% (3) agree 
12 team H2H, 7 cat (no TO or FT%) Nurkic (UP) or Favors (DOWN)
41.2d
moe05
71% (7) agree 
@rexs Yeah I never understood why folks ask for help when we have no clue what the makeup of their team is and what they are punting. Sometimes the best overall player is not the right one for your team.
41.3d
renzgonzales28
89% (19) agree 
@rexs have some chill pill dude
41.4d
rexs
17% (30) agree 
This is not an up/down room. it's a comment room. I wish these clowns had enough of a brain to make up their own mind, as they are the ones who should know their team best. If everyone else would stop clicking up or down, maybe they would give up and allow this room to be used as intended.
41.6d
ummmiono
50% (8) agree 
Nurkic (UP) or Tyreke Evans (DOWN)? Thanks!
41.7d
transition3s
20% (5) agree 
Elfrid Payton (down) or Nurkic (up)? 8 cat h2h, my team has good %'s and I've only lost assists 3 times this year.
41.8d
Gupster33
I could take the FG% hit but the FT% hit would hurt. Projecting 3.7 FTA/game then?
41.8d
asung
44% (9) agree 
Nurkic (up) or Greg Monroe (down)?
41.8d
#19032
100% (1) agree 
Is it bad that I had a hard time dropping Tolliver for Nurkic when this news came out? Lol...not a ton of faith in Nurk Nurk.
41.8d
deadmau5whomp
24% (17) agree 
just picked up nurkic and someone offered me JVal/Capela for my Brook Lopez/Nurkic, do this (up) or stay put (down)
41.8d
joshlloyd48
I'd be ok spending $30.
41.8d
joshlloyd48
80% (5) agree 
Nurkic is worth the add, but your %s will have to take a hit. I also wouldn't rule out a nice role for Ed Davis, who is actually their best centre now. As for Plumlee, his value gets hit in a big way. I don't think he plays much at the four. He is worth holding in most cases just to see, but I have little confidence that he remains useful.
41.8d
deadmau5whomp
43% (7) agree 
nurkic (up) or marvin williams (down)
41.9d
brendans
100% (1) agree 
Worth noting that several in DEN media have noted lately that Nurkic looks like he's put on 20+ lbs since start of season. Will be interesting to see if his attitude improves and he is able to get motivated again but I'll be shocked if he's able to produce like he did early in the season even if given big minutes.
41.9d
MaciejKowalik
27% (11) agree 
up Nurkic down Capela
41.9d
moe05
100% (3) agree 
Every time he was given a chance to start this year , he did nothing with it.
41.9d
GDiama
100% (1) agree 
Kyle the available Cs are Davis, Leonard and Nurkic. I don't really see a matchup game going on as the first two are garbage. Maybe Nurkic is too, but that they have to figure out so they ll give him all the mins they can in my opinion.
41.9d
schaarkyjr
100% (2) agree 
Interested what the mod's think of Nurkic's outlook for the rest of the season. Up Nurkic down Clarkston
41.9d
kylemckeown16
100% (3) agree 
I just picked up Nurkic anywhere I could. He'll likely hurt your FG% and FT%, but Nurkic should put up good points, rebounds, blocks, and steals (for a center). The Blazers traded a lot for him. He should be their starting center, but the Blazers are only one game out of the playoffs, so it's possible Stotts will still play the matchup game in the frontcourt some. IMO, you should take a flier on Nurkic right now.
41.9d
flipdice
50% (4) agree 
(UP) Nurkic, (DOWN) Willy Hernangomez
41.9d
Jayde
100% (4) agree 
Portland doesn't really have any replacement for Plumlee other than Nurkic and Plumlee was getting a solid 28 minutes a game. So it's hard to think that this won't be great for Nurkic.
41.9d
schaarkyjr
Interested what the mod's think of Nurkic's outlook for the rest of the season. Up Nurkic down Clarkston
41.9d
USD4s
0% (1) agree 
Anyone already on Portland gain value? Will they go small more?
41.9d
#63195
33% (3) agree 
Punt points Must add nurkic (Up) Continue stream spot in very close standings (down)
41.9d
velvethoops
100% (5) agree 
FML, i picked him up again. He's that bad ex-gf you keep going back to. I'm going to bench him until he shows me 1 good game lol.
41.9d
TheNorthSide
60% (5) agree 
Can we get Josh's or Kyle's opinion on this trade.
41.9d
al3b3d3v
92% (13) agree 
Drop Lance Stephenson for nurkic?
41.9d
#42520
33% (6) agree 
Drop Dion Waiters for Nurk?
41.9d
Dckiller27
29% (7) agree 
Time to unleash the beast. Per 36 of 16/11 2.5 ast 1.6 blks 1.1 stls. The guy won't be much offensively since he is raw on that side and Lillard/CJ will take all the touches but he will clean up the boards and be a rim protector the Blazers so desperately need. He's gonna have to deal with foul trouble and getting used to the system and fantasy owners are gonna have to deal with his possible punt FT% but I think he can average 28 MPG 12 Pts, 9 Rebs, 2 Ast, 1.6 blks, 1 stl 50 FG%, 55 FT%
41.9d
#42520
33% (3) agree 
Drop Dion Waiters for Nurk?
41.9d
sircharlesbarkley
33% (9) agree 
absolutely worth a pick.. guaranteed 30+ minutes..
41.9d
LagunaLaker
18% (11) agree 
drop Cody Zeller for Nurkic?
41.9d
G00S3
100% (1) agree 
I wouldn't drop anyone stable for him, but yeah, I've taken a flier in one league at the end of my roster.
41.9d
dylan33
75% (4) agree 
worth a pick ?
41.9d
gehrenberg
Wow Mason Plumlee for Nurkic
41.9d
G00S3
100% (3) agree 
En route to Portland? Woj bomb here: https://twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA/status/830842826204254208
52.2d
kokiAlexandre
0% (2) agree 
He needs to seriously get out of Denver... He is young and in the past has shown enough talent to deserve a stint at another organization.
52.5d
charlie_brown102
100% (3) agree 
No more Nurk Alerts please
52.5d
velvethoops
100% (4) agree 
.091 is his fg% this week. This guy is the real joker on the team. His performance is just laughable.
56.5d
mareshcj
80% (5) agree 
I do believe we all forgot that he sucks. Oops.
57.9d
jay14bay
looks like DEN has at least 2 games to show him off with Joker out
59.8d
kylemckeown16
nicobohrer -- I haven't seen anything new since the Marc Stein report came out 5 days ago.
60.0d
nicobohrer
0% (1) agree 
Any news on Nurk to be traded?
63.9d
jhiller
33% (9) agree 
Trying to stash in case of trades that DEN and ORL are rumoured to be making. Nurkic UP or Biyombo DOWN
64.8d
kylemckeown16
Nurkic will be worth taking a flier on if/when he gets traded, but until we know where he'd be going, it's hard to have an expectation for his production after a trade. I think most teams should be trying to trade for him. The only teams that I think wouldn't make the effort to trade for Nurkic are: DET, PHI, MIN, ORL, and UTA.
64.8d
TheRealKaboom2
100% (1) agree 
Lakers? Josh, please don't say that. I think we want as little competition for minutes as possible for our man Zu Alcindor.
64.8d
joshlloyd48
There's a lot of variable with all trade runours. Number one, does he get traded. I'd say less than 50% of runours actually happen. Secondly, where does he go and what role does he have? On what team is he an upgrade and what would that team give up? Dallas, Lakers, but who else? Dallas maybe give up Anderson, Lakers don't have much to offer. Nurkic has his own issues as well with fouling, %s, as well so it's tough to see him being a guy to keep providing he gives zero for a month until trade deadline
64.8d
Davepaiser
0% (2) agree 
Is nurkic worth adding when or if he goes to another team?
64.9d
EnderDantes
From starting center on opening night, to being benched, to trade bait.....life comes at you fast folks. Hopefully he goes to a good team and can get some minutes
64.9d
nadertime78
As a Dallas fan I would love to see it, but they don't have much to trade that Denver would want or just trade in general.
64.9d
mchilson21
100% (1) agree 
Dallas could use a younger center like Nurk. The problem with Denver is they have a ton of assets as it stands now and getting a good vet to solidify the 8 seed slows the development of their young players.
64.9d
cloudstah
Lakers, perfect
64.9d
jhiller
I feel like anywhere besides Denver would be good for him. Maybe NOR? or even HOU
64.9d
ganggreen89
100% (1) agree 
Finally dropped him last night for middleton.... :/
64.9d
nadertime78
0% (1) agree 
Mark Stein is reporting he is sure to be traded. Any thoughts on where he might land or the best spot for him?
81.5d
gehrenberg
100% (4) agree 
A couple things to consider. Faried is currently hurt and he is still playing under 20 minutes
81.5d
gaurang.mendon
After finally deciding to drop him a little while ago it seems like he's finally turning the corner again. Damn you Nurkic :( Coach Malone is prob the one to blame here.
97.6d
mikehubes
100% (1) agree 
What a bust. Even his current projos are way over what he'll do. He simply has too many mental lapses for a big role. He can improve given his age, but Jokic is miles better.
98.5d
funtasy
100% (10) agree 
Officially droppable in 12 team league? Combined 12 minutes last 2 games, sort of a blowout game tonight but he didn't leave bench after half time
100.2d
gaurang.mendon
100% (3) agree 
Nurkic fantasy owners hit rock bottom last night. :( For his sake I hope he gets traded to a better situation.
106.7d
LordPedro
100% (4) agree 
Just dropped Nurk for Cody Zeller and I ain't looking back!!
107.6d
jw9nine
100% (2) agree 
Finally! Been harping all season that Nurk/Faried frontcourt isn't good for Nurk from a fantasy level. Faried is way too active and Nurk is as well. With Arthur, it allows Nurk to be able to operate down low. Arthur has range so this is a good move imo.
108.1d
#27155
100% (1) agree 
I'd bet my paycheck that Nurk goes to the bench and gets his minutes racheted down to about 20per game by the end of the month, and wouldn't be surprised if it happened within the week. BBBBUTTTT (screeching tires noise) I actually think he could benefit from that, being the main bench scoring option. Still, I'd drop him for just about anything right now.
108.7d
Houndie
I'd start my mum over Gordon.
110.8d
kylemckeown16
mlg009 -- Injuries forced me to include him in one weekly lineup, and I have him on the bench in my other weekly lineup league. At least he has 4 games to try and get more minutes in.
111.0d
jw9nine
Have both and can't find a better replacement than Nurk on the wire that would help me with current matchup. News that Okafor is questionable is a bummer. Sixers running 2 bigs is probably best shot for Nurk to get more than 20 mins. Lol
111.1d
mlg009
With Jokic out until this weekend is anyone tempting fate and starting him in h2h's this week? Denver has a nice schedule this week but Nurkic might not even play 30 minutes COMBINED in all four games this week. This guy is a mess!
111.6d
gehrenberg
100% (3) agree 
Even if he does get more minutes would it really matter with his current level of play? He's ranked 261 in per 36 minute stats
111.6d
LordPedro
100% (8) agree 
Would you cut Nurkic for Cody Zeller at this point? Not sure if there is upside anymore with Nurk unless Malone changes minutes allotment or a trade.
112.2d
EnderDantes
100% (6) agree 
Dropped him for Henson. I know Kidd is unpredictable, but Malone isn't much better, if better at all. I'm willing to take my chances at this point.
112.5d
jw9nine
Have both Nurk and Jokic. Jokic gets hurt and Malone doesn't even play this guy 20 mins. Malone supposed to be a decent coach? Claim to fame is what--How he didn't have the worst record when he was coaching the Kings a few yrs back?
112.5d
LRC_Kevin
100% (8) agree 
Can this guy be cut for a hot free agent like John Henson? He has been absolutely awful.
114.7d
charlie_brown102
100% (1) agree 
I don't own Nurkic (Jokic owner here). What most dissapoints me about Mike Malone is they feed Jameer (old AF) Nelson 17 mins within the first half. I realize diff positions but its seriously messed up how he is dishing time out in Denver right now.
114.8d
EnderDantes
100% (8) agree 
I remember when I felt smart for drafting this guy. Seems so long ago in a galaxy far far away.
117.2d
#43607
PS: daily league
117.2d
#43607
Patience is wearing thin already. The big guy has been a drag and minutes are dropping by the week. Does it make sense to hold in a 12 team, 15 player/t, 9-cat league or would my team be better served streaming guys like Pat Patterson, Henson or Courtney Lee?
118.7d
dunishr
0% (1) agree 
Well, Mike Malone had to find 21 minutes for the immortal Darrell Arthur tonight even though the Suns were running out a twin towers lineup with Chandler and Len...
118.7d
EnderDantes
100% (2) agree 
Owning this guy is highly annoying. Driving me crazy
118.7d
scoobydoo
17% (6) agree 
I know this question was posted a week ago, but probably time to revisit it... Nurkic (up) or C. Zeller (down) ROS value in roto? 8 cats
118.8d
jw9nine
0% (8) agree 
ROS Up for Nurk down for Aaron Gordon
119.3d
markalbert2kx
Should I trade him for a non-FT killer? Seems worse than projected..
122.5d
lukepettigrew1
Great time to put him back in my lineup
124.8d
#19032
100% (1) agree 
Thanks, Kyle. The only others I could drop would be Zeller or Covington. But Bogut would seem like the best drop.
124.8d
kylemckeown16
#19032 -- I'd personally take Nurkic's upside over Bogut.
124.8d
jasongindele
100% (1) agree 
If it's between Nurkic and Bogut, I'd pick up Nurkic (though maybe not using a waiver priority position). Nurkic has a higher upside and Bogut may get moved if Dallas rebuilds, from what I've read.
124.8d
#19032
Nurkic hit the wire. Worth dropping Bogut for him? Really just worried about the crowded frontcourt and his drag on my efficiency (fg, ft, a/t ratio). I'm already #1 in points in my league so don't really need Nurkic's points and dimes are very important in our league since we have a/t as a category. But then with Dallas heading into rebuilding mode, worried about Bogut's declining role. Any advice?
127.8d
kylemckeown16
100% (2) agree 
VCNasta -- Based on the minutes/production they're all currently getting, I'd want Lopez and Gordon right now, but I'm not sure I trust Lopez's big minutes over the last four games, though the Bulls are on a winning streak, so they might make a point to keep him out there a lot in the short-term. Tough call, and I think it comes down to who you think will be better down the line this season, Nurkic or Lopez? I would usually lean toward keeping Nurkic's potential over Lopez's steady production, but that is not necessarily the right choice here. The Nuggets frontcourt situation looks like it may remain muddied for a while longer. We're essentially waiting for an injury or trade to help clear things up, and who knows when/if one of those things happens.
127.8d
vcnasta
Nurkic, Aaron Gordon, Robin Lopez. Which two should I keep?
128.4d
Eldar7
11% (9) agree 
Drop Nurkic for C.Zeller?
128.5d
mareshcj
100% (1) agree 
Agree, as soon as Jokic/Nurkic lineup died, so should his 27mpg projection.
128.5d
markalbert2kx
100% (1) agree 
Is he going to be projected lower?
128.6d
jeocon10
12% (8) agree 
Would you trade Jusuf Nurkic for John Henson?
129.5d
Eldar7
100% (1) agree 
To drop him for Farid or Tristen Thompson? It's really hard to hang in there while he playing only 15 min
131.9d
jw9nine
*away from the basket (not ball)
131.9d
jw9nine
2 young potentially studs in Jok and Nurk but both play the same position. Imo, DEN would be best served by trying to trade one of them before the team/coach ends up ruining whatever value is left for either of these 2. Only other way I see this turning out alright is if they turn Nurk into a PF. Don't think he has the mobility to guard opposing stretch 4s nor the range/game to play away from the ball.
133.5d
thparadox
100% (1) agree 
how do these guys get coaching gigs? It's unbelievable. Faried guarding Drummond is a joke
133.6d
Joey_B
100% (4) agree 
Mike Malone is officially an idiot.
133.6d
EnderDantes
What is going on tonight with him? One shot attempt in the first half and 2 rebounds???
142.4d
LordPedro
50% (2) agree 
the Bosnian Bear has been pretty on point with BBM projections so far. It's definitely helped me now after I reached for him draft day. There's breakout potential in a 3rd year for a player, but I think there still needs to be time to see how Mike Malone runs his lineups and how Nurk and Jokic are adjusting playing together.
142.6d
farmhill
67% (3) agree 
Let's get some love for Nurkic on these projections. He's an animal. You've said you don't want to be reactionary, but then why are some guys value (e.g. Klay and Booker) seeing value slashed by .2 or more overnight but a guy who has been outperforming in all rates/36 like Nurkic not getting the big bump?
145.5d
tjf673
13% (15) agree 
Trade Nurkic for Steven Adams?
145.9d
kylemckeown16
100% (2) agree 
JSquints - I get your point, but we also don't want to be too reactionary with changing the season-long projections. I gave my personal opinion as to who I would rather have in H2H. Given the minutes Pau has been getting and Nurkic's production, I know I'd want Nurkic right now.
146.0d
jsquints
100% (3) agree 
You have Pau projected 20 spots higher than Nurk per game and 45 spots in total value. But you would absolutely take Nurk in a straight up trade?
147.9d
kylemckeown16
100% (3) agree 
Absolutely. I'd rather have Nurkic.
147.9d
Joey_B
100% (5) agree 
Would you trade Pau Gasol straight up for Nurk in a 9 cat H2H league?
149.0d
kslight
ESPN has been updated, and it looks like a few players got new eligibility.
149.0d
EnderDantes
Just got PF Eligibility on ESPN
150.5d
brendans
0% (1) agree 
I think they CAN play together but it's not maximizing Jokic's skill at all. Nurk isn't really affected but Jokic can't really operate as the great playmaker he is when Nurkic is also there clogging things up. I love them both but I feel like they're wasting Jokic playing them together. Starting them and then playing them 8 min a game or so together would be fine and that's what I hope Malone ends up doing.
150.5d
dl22
50% (2) agree 
This double big thing is a ruse, both Jokic and Nurkic are great centers, too slow to play side by side though. Something's gonna give.
150.5d
gehrenberg
Davis was toasting everybody tonight. I think the part of the thought process was to just keep throwing fresh bodies at him. Faried is still a capable player that will be getting playing time. I suspect at some point this season there is a good chance he will either get hurt or traded which should open up more frontcourt minutes
150.5d
jw9nine
really? Nurk was doing alright I think against NOR frontline during the 1st 3 qtrs. Jok i see had 4 TOs. Interesting that DEN went small.
150.5d
themorticia
The brow.
150.5d
jw9nine
Didn't watch the game. Any thoughts on why Nurk/Jok didn't play much (at all) during the 4th Q?
153.2d
joshlloyd48
I've been working from the position that Nurkic was going to be the starter for the last few weeks
153.2d
Houndie
Does Nurkic's position now change that he's a starter, or was that figured in already?
154.8d
joshlloyd48
100% (3) agree 
I like Bogut a lot for this season, but I'd take Nurkic over him
154.8d
Eldar7
0% (1) agree 
Who would you pick? Nurkic or Bugot? I really like Bugot in Dallas, but based on the preseason Nurkic seems to have a bigger upside. Appreciate your thoughts. Tnx
158.5d
joshlloyd48
That's true Brendan, I'll continue looking at it
158.5d
brendans
2/8 at the line tonight tho...one thing with Nurkic is things really seem to get in his head. When he struggles he starts really rushing shots even more than he usually does (1/8 fg tonight), turning it over, missing FTs, etc.
158.5d
joshlloyd48
Last season he took 99 FTA and he has already taken 42 in preseason, converting at 81%, so while five games is small, it's half of his total attempts from last season and looks like he has improved significantly. Maybe it's a tad optimistic, but it's safe to say he has improved
158.6d
charlie_brown102
100% (1) agree 
What makes BBM think Nurkic is going to shoot .702 this season? At best his form over the last 2 years (.616 and .636). indicates mid 600's which allows for some improvement. I suspect he's going to be a big FT drain this season with extra minutes.
159.8d
bruwm237
Is the FT shooting in the preseason for real?
163.1d
Sephiroth_98
100% (2) agree 
Thanks john. Lots of talk about Nurkic and Jokic. Is Jokic really that much more desirable or just a lot of hype? razy one is targeted at 2n round and the other at like 10 (Nurkic)
163.1d
johnbender
100% (3) agree 
Gobert all day here. Nurkic is looking good, but Gobert has second round upside - especially if he keeps making his FTs.
163.8d
Sephiroth_98
turn of 5fth round, i can choose between nurkic or gobert. Am i missing something here about Nurkic?
167.1d
kokiAlexandre
I have always been a fan of Nurki.nator. Hopefully he becomes a real steal to whoever bets on him this coming Fantasy season.
167.5d
Nate_Swan
100% (1) agree 
Frothing over this guys performance in pre-season so far. He's like an Eastern European Boogie. The FG%/FT% and volume is hugely encouraging.
Per Game
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/g3/gr/ga/gs/gb/gfg%fga/gft%fta/gto/gUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
67-0.03Projection 16-17PORSubscribe now to view 2016-17 Projection
660.00Short-term (4/12)POR1028.012.70.08.93.21.21.7.50610.1.6503.82.922.8-0.32-1.341.270.060.362.100.62-1.47-1.26
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/g3/gr/ga/gs/gb/gfg%fga/gft%fta/gto/gUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
204-0.44NBA 16-17POR6221.09.70.06.91.80.81.1.5097.9.5533.12.223.3-0.87-1.410.46-0.55-0.600.860.53-1.94-0.46
126-0.22Last WeekPOR426.515.50.011.32.00.51.5.57411.8.4005.01.527.30.12-1.412.11-0.47-1.231.632.21-5.190.29
102-0.16Last 2 WeeksPOR828.013.00.010.32.41.01.9.50511.6.4003.12.625.4-0.31-1.411.73-0.300.002.340.71-3.25-0.99
490.06Last MonthPOR1629.614.40.09.93.51.22.0.49711.6.6304.63.025.3-0.07-1.411.590.210.472.570.54-1.94-1.41
135-0.26Last 2 MonthsPOR2424.511.20.08.02.61.01.5.4829.3.5983.82.524.4-0.61-1.410.87-0.190.001.630.17-1.96-0.80
187-0.37Last 3 MonthsPOR3521.710.00.06.82.20.91.2.4988.0.5823.52.123.1-0.82-1.410.44-0.36-0.351.060.38-1.93-0.34
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/g3/gr/ga/gs/gb/gfg%fga/gft%fta/gto/gUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
245-0.51NBA 15-16DEN3217.18.20.05.41.30.81.4.4177.6.6163.11.728.0-1.17-1.20-0.10-0.82-0.651.18-0.68-1.210.10
202-0.40NBA 14-15DEN6217.86.90.06.20.80.81.1.4466.2.6362.11.421.6-1.55-1.190.21-1.00-0.380.71-0.18-0.790.53
Per 36
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/363/36r/36a/36s/36b/36fg%fga/36ft%fta/36to/36USGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
107-0.17Projection 16-17PORSubscribe now to view 2016-17 Projection
86-0.09Short-term (4/12)POR1028.016.30.011.54.21.52.2.50612.9.6504.93.722.8-0.19-1.211.270.240.431.690.43-1.55-1.89
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/363/36r/36a/36s/36b/36fg%fga/36ft%fta/36to/36USGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
277-0.46NBA 16-17POR6221.016.60.011.83.11.31.9.50913.5.5535.33.723.3-0.27-1.300.90-0.190.010.950.34-2.88-1.67
197-0.43Last WeekPOR426.521.10.015.32.70.72.0.57416.0.4006.82.027.30.55-1.301.69-0.36-0.951.131.41-6.110.07
211-0.40Last 2 WeeksPOR828.016.70.013.23.01.32.4.50514.9.4004.03.425.4-0.26-1.301.21-0.22-0.021.530.33-3.55-1.32
135-0.21Last MonthPOR1629.617.50.012.04.31.42.4.49714.1.6305.63.725.3-0.11-1.300.950.300.231.560.20-2.08-1.61
214-0.35Last 2 MonthsPOR2424.516.40.011.73.81.52.2.48213.6.5985.63.624.4-0.31-1.300.880.120.271.31-0.01-2.51-1.56
240-0.38Last 3 MonthsPOR3521.716.60.011.33.71.42.0.49813.2.5825.83.423.1-0.28-1.300.800.060.201.080.19-2.80-1.37
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/363/36r/36a/36s/36b/36fg%fga/36ft%fta/36to/36USGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
241-0.33NBA 15-16DEN3217.117.30.011.52.61.62.9.41715.9.6166.53.628.00.03-1.011.17-0.260.321.80-1.00-2.37-1.65
147-0.20NBA 14-15DEN6217.813.90.012.51.61.72.2.44612.5.6364.32.821.6-0.79-1.141.57-0.750.790.91-0.28-1.23-0.88
Totals
RankValueNameTeamgminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatoUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
70-0.02Projection 16-17PORSubscribe now to view 2016-17 Projection
570.05Short-term (4/12)POR10280:00127089321217.506101.650382922.8-0.21-1.291.380.110.412.250.65-1.51-1.32
RankValueNameTeamgminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatoUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
188-0.44NBA 16-17POR621301:5460104261134768.509487.55319013423.3-0.88-1.380.32-0.56-0.670.790.54-1.76-0.35
86-0.12Last WeekPOR4105:4862045826.57447.40020627.30.52-1.162.60-0.31-0.701.741.27-4.79-0.20
69-0.03Last 2 WeeksPOR8224:1810408219815.50593.400252125.40.25-1.282.56-0.070.462.770.48-3.73-1.71
410.14Last MonthPOR16473:172300158561932.497185.630734825.30.18-1.271.960.280.592.960.41-2.12-1.70
134-0.27Last 2 MonthsPOR24589:112690191632436.482222.598925924.4-0.69-1.400.69-0.29-0.131.600.14-1.71-0.61
178-0.39Last 3 MonthsPOR35758:183490239783042.498279.5821227223.1-0.90-1.360.20-0.44-0.490.960.31-1.64-0.13
RankValueNameTeamgminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatoUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
326-0.75NBA 15-16DEN32547:032630174402444.417242.616995528.0-1.91-1.19-1.31-1.12-1.53-0.13-0.29-0.531.23
213-0.47NBA 14-15DEN621103:184260382505268.446383.6361328521.6-1.70-1.21-0.06-1.06-0.600.50-0.15-0.670.75

Game Log
DateOppSummaryStartValueTeamminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatopfUSGStatus
3/25/2017MINW 112 - 100Y-0.35POR22:311409401.50014.00020132.9 
3/23/2017NYKW 110 - 95Y-0.49POR27:2516010300.6679.57172523.8 
3/21/2017MILL 90 - 93Y0.05POR26:4711014122.5569.33334423.5 
3/19/2017@ MIAW 115 - 104Y-0.07POR29:0521012003.60015.37580328.9 
3/18/2017@ ATLW 113 - 97Y1.15POR32:131209625.54511.00004419.3 
3/15/2017@ SASW 110 - 106Y-0.39POR34:311609341.38918.40055333.4 
3/14/2017@ NORL 77 - 100Y-1.71POR22:03208000.1258.00004125.4 
3/12/2017@ PHOW 110 - 101Y0.51POR29:4312011203.6679.00002516.0 
3/11/2017WASL 124 - 125Y-0.62POR28:11707213.2508.75045524.1 
3/9/2017PHIW 114 - 108Y2.21POR37:4828020826.50018.769133530.7 
3/7/2017@ OKCW 126 - 121Y-0.32POR24:481708410.41712.87584534.4 
3/4/2017BKNW 130 - 116Y-0.52POR29:381706510.54511.62583325.8 
3/2/2017OKCW 114 - 109Y1.71POR37:4218012625.70010.80054318.9 
2/28/2017@ DETL 113 - 120Y-0.29POR35:211907501.58312.71474524.6 
2/26/2017@ TORL 106 - 112Y-0.81POR21:02804210.3339.66731424.4 
2/23/2017@ ORLW 112 - 103Y0.90POR34:2912012532.50012.00003418.6 
2/15/2017@ UTAL 88 - 1110.60POR21:1813071311.0005.75044323.3 
2/13/2017GSWW 132 - 110DEN               
2/11/2017@ CLEL 109 - 125DEN               
2/10/2017@ NYKW 131 - 123-1.16DEN11:19203000.2504.00001119.2 
2/8/2017@ ATLL 106 - 117DEN               
2/6/2017DALW 110 - 87-1.04DEN5:16302000.5002.50020126.2 
2/4/2017@ SASL 97 - 121-0.52DEN23:41908211.5008.25040316.5 
2/3/2017MILW 121 - 117DEN               
2/1/2017MEML 99 - 119Y-1.31DEN18:50403300.2504.50041015.3 
1/31/2017@ LALL 116 - 120Y-1.41DEN12:18104101.0007.50020126.2 
1/28/2017@ PHOW 123 - 112Y-1.05DEN15:29504000.50041.00013320.8 
1/26/2017PHOW 127 - 120DEN               
1/24/2017UTAW 103 - 93-1.21DEN7:43202011.3333.00022134.2 
1/22/2017@ MINL 108 - 111DEN               
1/21/2017LACW 123 - 98-0.74DEN20:261205300.5717.57170222.2 
1/19/2017@ SASL 104 - 118-1.74DEN13:32501001.4005.20051124.0 
1/17/2017@ LALW 127 - 121-0.97DEN7:363031001.0001.50021114.8 
1/16/2017ORLW 125 - 112-1.00DEN6:26201100.5002.00001121.7 
1/12/2017INDW 140 - 112-0.85DEN7:473020011.0001.50021014.9 
1/7/2017@ OKCL 106 - 121Y-0.57DEN25:5411010031.35714.25042227.0 
1/5/2017SASL 99 - 127-0.70DEN20:40706000.7504.50021412.6 
1/3/2017SACL 113 - 1200.67DEN18:261606411.75081.00042130.3 
1/2/2017@ GSWL 119 - 1270.49DEN21:071506411.7508.75041319.8 
12/30/2016PHIL 122 - 124-0.89DEN18:33204110.2005.00001413.4 
12/28/2016MINW 105 - 103-0.55DEN8:404041011.0002.00002120.8 
12/26/2016@ LACW 106 - 102DEN               
12/23/2016ATLL 108 - 109DEN               
12/20/2016@ LACL 102 - 119DEN               
12/19/2016DALW 117 - 107DEN               
12/17/2016NYKW 127 - 114-0.76DEN7:42501011.4005.50021036.8 
12/15/2016PORW 132 - 120-0.80DEN4:30204000.5002.00000220.9 
12/12/2016@ DALL 92 - 112Y-0.86DEN18:22406210.3336.00003122.4 
12/10/2016@ ORLW 121 - 113Y-0.25DEN20:561708001.72711.50024134.2 
12/8/2016@ WASL 85 - 92Y-0.45DEN20:3013071001.0006.50024422.6 
12/7/2016@ BKNL 111 - 116Y-0.69DEN17:011103100.6676.75042120.9 
12/5/2016@ PHIW 106 - 98Y0.11DEN24:128010123.5008.00022419.9 
12/3/2016@ UTAL 98 - 105Y-0.41DEN13:06804100.6676.00000221.5 
12/2/2016HOUL 110 - 128Y-0.38DEN20:221007022.5569.00024226.5 
11/30/2016MIAL 98 - 106Y-1.15DEN17:24406100.6673.00005318.7 
11/27/2016@ PHOW 120 - 114Y-0.62DEN16:24806200.5717.00002323.5 
11/25/2016OKCL 129 - 132Y0.10DEN21:54807311.50061.00021114.6 
11/23/2016@ UTAL 83 - 108Y-1.91DEN14:48206001.1258.00031429.7 
11/22/2016CHIW 110 - 107Y0.38DEN29:2414014402.53813.00002121.0 
11/20/2016UTAW 105 - 91Y-1.05DEN25:3816011210.66712.00062228.4 
11/18/2016TORL 111 - 113Y-0.57DEN24:461401110.5569.66761322.6 
11/16/2016PHOW 120 - 104Y-1.12DEN15:03006401.0004.00003119.1 
11/13/2016@ PORL 105 - 112Y-1.32DEN18:34809001.27311.50042230.9 
11/12/2016DETL 95 - 106Y-1.10DEN16:51002010.0002.00002010.4 
11/10/2016GSWL 101 - 125Y-0.57DEN16:55903011.8005.50024223.0 
11/8/2016@ MEML 107 - 108Y-0.50DEN28:461107301.71471.00016520.8 
11/6/2016@ BOSW 123 - 107Y-0.98DEN13:17406211.2005.50042027.9 
11/5/2016@ DETL 86 - 103Y0.23DEN23:4410012121.6258.00004320.3 
11/3/2016@ MINW 102 - 99Y0.15DEN26:471805122.53813.57171426.6 
10/31/2016@ TORL 102 - 105Y0.16DEN38:0713018115.35714.42971221.9 
10/29/2016PORL 113 - 115Y-0.67DEN22:321209101.4449.66762223.4 
10/26/2016@ NORW 107 - 102Y0.69DEN26:012309301.69213.83361325.1 
DateOppSummaryStartValueTeamminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatopfUSGStatus
4/13/2016@ PORL 99 - 107Y0.05DEN38:5011014453.38513.25048523.0 
4/10/2016UTAL 84 - 100Y-1.57DEN21:54604102.18211.40051331.0 
4/8/2016SASW 102 - 98Y0.73DEN34:412109122.55618.50022427.3 
4/5/2016OKCL 102 - 124-0.55DEN16:32605202.2005.80051320.6 
4/2/2016SACL 106 - 115-0.96DEN16:20909201.40010.25041433.9 
3/31/2016@ NORL 95 - 101DEN               
3/30/2016@ MEMW 109 - 105DEN               
3/28/2016DALL 88 - 97DEN               
3/27/2016@ LACL 90 - 1050.13DEN24:121907301.69213.50023329.4 
3/25/2016@ LALW 116 - 1050.27DEN26:181804512.63611.66763327.2 
3/23/2016PHIW 104 - 1030.13DEN16:06505024.2504.75042521.1 
3/21/2016@ CLEL 91 - 124-0.22DEN25:401107313.7147.25044321.7 
3/19/2016@ CHAW 101 - 93-0.88DEN17:571003111.30010.80053236.6 
3/17/2016@ ATLL 98 - 116-0.12DEN25:541007211.50010.00002320.4 
3/15/2016@ ORLL 110 - 116DEN               
3/14/2016@ MIAL 119 - 124DEN               
3/12/2016WASW 116 - 1000.24DEN17:581704112.6258.77892332.6 
3/10/2016PHOW 116 - 98-0.24DEN4:27203021.5002.00001132.3 
3/8/2016NYKW 110 - 94DEN               
3/6/2016DALW 116 - 114DEN               
3/4/2016BKNL 120 - 121DEN               
3/2/2016LALW 117 - 107DEN               
2/29/2016MEML 96 - 103DEN               
2/26/2016@ DALL 116 - 122DEN               
2/24/2016@ LACW 87 - 81DEN               
2/23/2016SACL 110 - 114DEN               
2/21/2016BOSL 101 - 121-0.69DEN11:574020111.00011.00024320.9 
2/19/2016@ SACL 110 - 116-0.37DEN14:06405202.3336.00000517.2 
2/10/2016@ DETW 103 - 920.50DEN24:1416011211.66712.00003328.4 
2/8/2016@ BKNL 104 - 105-0.26DEN17:23806120.33391.00021228.4 
2/7/2016@ NYKW 101 - 96-0.91DEN7:19301010.5002.50021125.4 
2/5/2016CHIW 115 - 110-0.80DEN12:11206102.00041.00022323.7 
2/3/2016@ UTAL 81 - 85-1.00DEN14:49505100.3333.75042122.0 
2/1/2016TORW 112 - 93-0.99DEN15:09407110.20010.00001332.3 
1/30/2016@ INDL 105 - 109-0.41DEN16:51702112.3336.75041223.3 
1/28/2016@ WASW 117 - 113-0.24DEN15:38805201.42971.00020221.4 
1/27/2016@ BOSL 103 - 111-1.55DEN12:00205101.2005.00031224.7 
1/25/2016ATLL 105 - 119-1.07DEN6:39401000.25041.00021235.0 
1/23/2016DETW 104 - 101DEN               
1/21/2016MEML 101 - 102-1.15DEN3:22000000.0000.00001315.8 
1/19/2016OKCL 104 - 110DEN               
1/17/2016INDW 129 - 126DEN               
1/15/2016MIAL 95 - 98DEN               
1/13/2016GSWW 112 - 110-0.71DEN14:49804101.37581.00022229.8 
1/10/2016CHAW 95 - 92-0.49DEN13:54707011.3339.50020333.2 
1/8/2016@ MEML 84 - 91-0.86DEN18:27606001.2508.66730522.0 
1/6/2016@ MINW 78 - 740.14DEN22:0015010205.42914.50061538.7 
1/3/2016PORL 106 - 112-0.85DEN14:391208001.5717.44490231.8 
1/2/2016@ GSWL 108 - 111-1.51DEN4:47302000.0005.75041064.2