Josh Richardson - MIA - G

 Open Historical Profile
TeamMIA
Age23
Draft2015 (Pick 40)
NBA Salary$874,636
Projection Updated4/11/2017
128.7d
TreborGrebtsev
The breakout is real, too bad injuries derailed so much of his season. Hope the Heat make it to the playoffs so we can get some more JRich action. Interesting for next season.
134.4d
Lakedst
100% (3) agree 
Up Josh Richardson Down: Ish Smith
141.2d
IrvDizzle
Potential impact on Josh's #s if/when Waiters Island comes back?
152.6d
trakis13
100% (1) agree 
Richardson (UP) - Ellington (DOWN) 9-cat ROTO
170.5d
Donnie99
100% (1) agree 
The party did not even start
170.5d
sif2988
0% (5) agree 
UP Josh richardson is ramping up minutes and will be good, DOWN the party is over, drop city.
173.6d
dustinrae
0% (2) agree 
Up Josh Richardson Down Mirotic
173.9d
Dez45
Anyone see him play? Moving well?
176.2d
Stagger_Lee
100% (1) agree 
Would you drop Plumlee (Up) or Frye (down) for J-Rich.
179.6d
neilrizo
Nance over Mudiay?
179.9d
userw
100% (3) agree 
ROS Richardson (UP) or Thabo (Down)?
180.1d
gehrenberg
Definitely. Richardson doesn't need a trade to happen to have value
180.1d
provechkin
80% (5) agree 
Worth a stash over Ish Smith?
185.9d
svengali90
Please refer to J.Lin thread created earlier today.
185.9d
#19032
0% (1) agree 
Given that even when J-Lin comes back he'll probably be treated with kid gloves (mins limit, b2b rest, etc.), who is the better stash at this point? Punting assists. ROS value. J-Rich (up), J-Lin (down)?
188.3d
kylemckeown16
#19032 -- Nothing definitive. He's traveling with the team and could return before the All-Star break, but it's also possible the Heat just decide to rest him through the break.
188.3d
#19032
0% (1) agree 
Is there any new news that has come out that causes the projected return date to keep getting pushed out? Last I saw, he was trying to get back before the All Star Break. Not realistic I guess?
192.6d
ummmiono
75% (4) agree 
Josh Richardson (UP) or Pau Gasol (DOWN)? Thanks guys!
193.4d
kslight
100% (3) agree 
If available, Middleton should return Wednesday and has more upside.
193.4d
Jstew
Think he's safer than Middleton? Is he expected to have a minutes restriction?
194.1d
Dez45
67% (3) agree 
time to pick up?
198.7d
Jarvis03
86% (7) agree 
Drop RHJ for jRich?
199.0d
Dez45
10% (10) agree 
Do people think he will hit the ground running once he returns? Worth adding in a H2H 12 team?
214.2d
Donnie99
That's the thing about him, it's all about upside and aside from the 3 games outlier, he can't even string few good games.But I hear you, Cortman the FA is bare thin.
214.2d
Cortmanwasdead
100% (2) agree 
@Donnie99- I probably would not drop in a 20 team league. I imagine your wire is quite bare and it might be hard to get a guy with as much upside.
214.2d
Donnie99
60% (5) agree 
Contemplating on dropping this guy, has been trash on his efficiency and has been negative in all but 4 games after he came back from his ankle injury. In a vacuum in a 20 teamer league, worth dropping? up (yes), down (no)
215.9d
ummmiono
23% (13) agree 
He was just dropped in my 14-team league. Is he worth a #2 waiver? YES (UP) or NO (DOWN). Thanks guys!
220.5d
funtasy
71% (14) agree 
drop jrich for gary harris? UP for YES. DOWN for NO. thanks
220.5d
Keno
100% (3) agree 
UP for JRich, DOWN for Bazemore ROS
222.0d
nadertime78
100% (2) agree 
MRI negative and considered day to day. Only 2 games next with the first being Tuesday. Id say he only misses a game. If he misses Friday too its another day with a heavy schedule so its possible no games are lost depending on the format.
222.2d
jisong
I know this sounds ridiculous, but is this really just bad luck for these Miami injuries? I feel it's just too much for such a young team, and of course for us as well...
222.3d
Bucephalus
I'm finding a 3-6 timeline for non-athletes so 1-4 sounds about right. Of course we won't know until we find out the severity, but if he doesn't get injury designation I might have to drop.
222.3d
nadertime78
100% (1) agree 
Reading its a soft tissue injury. Depending on the grade of it he could be out 1 to 4 weeks from what I could find. Spo doesn't plan on him playing tomorrow
222.3d
Bucephalus
Left practice in a walking boot according to RW. Waiting until medical examine but wtf?? Practice injury?
224.3d
Dominic-Nguyen
17% (6) agree 
Idk but they need to be. Looking like he's going to break out and go ham soon without winslow now
224.3d
TheNorthSide
11% (9) agree 
Why isn't anyone talking about this guy
225.7d
kokiAlexandre
@PercyWong8 DColl might have better %'s but JoshR gives you more across the board stats.
225.8d
PercyWong8
78% (9) agree 
Up for JRich, down for DCollison
226.4d
Keno
100% (8) agree 
Who would you start tonight, Tony Allen against the Lakers or JRich against the Suns? With Dragic possibly back I'm sure JRich will take a bit of a hit, UP for jRich DOWN for Allen.
228.0d
Donnie99
He should have pg eligibility. However, i think they are cautious to players who already have 2 positions already. Draymond have sf/pf but we all know that he is a pf/c for 2 seasons now
228.2d
gehrenberg
100% (1) agree 
They don't do their own position eligibilities
228.2d
jisong
50% (2) agree 
Time to give Richardson PG eligibility. Yahoo seems to be too cautious to do these this season.
229.8d
TreborGrebtsev
100% (2) agree 
Wrong week to put him on the bench, hope he can keep this up :)
230.0d
G00S3
Fair point. Let's see what you got, JRich!
230.1d
gehrenberg
100% (2) agree 
There wasn't really a dip in form. He has never had a track record of playing at a level this highl. I think this is more like his breakout
230.1d
G00S3
What a turnaround this week. Are people thinking the dip in form was likely due to nagging ankle/wrist issues?
230.5d
renzgonzales28
60% (15) agree 
Jrich Up Smart Down???
231.0d
TheNorthSide
54% (26) agree 
I know majority of you agreed with Sefolosha over Josh Richardson...but after those last two performances, I just really have to make sure... J Rich (UP) or Sefolosha (DOWN)
231.1d
Thrillard45
100% (4) agree 
It was a long wait fellas but looks like he got his mojo back. Let's hope he can keep it up when Dragic is fully healthy/Waiters comes back
232.9d
akamadations
100% (4) agree 
Drop Crawford for him?
233.0d
TheNorthSide
33% (12) agree 
J Rich (UP) or T Sefolosha (DOWN)
233.1d
Jarvis03
91% (11) agree 
I dropped him for Brogdon the other day. Should I pick up j rich again?
233.1d
Donnie99
100% (5) agree 
4 days rest do wonders
233.1d
Thrillard45
First time in a long time he's shooting well
234.3d
jbs5635
Admits to sharp pain every time he shoots. Hard to see things improving unless they decide to sit him until he gets healthy.
237.7d
GDiama
100% (2) agree 
The guy had mcl, ankle and wrist problems this season. I think he will break out after the ASB. Needs time to shake all these off.
237.8d
kokiAlexandre
0% (2) agree 
Had enough of him, had to drop him for Troy Daniels...
238.0d
gehrenberg
Always looked like this. It's not a coincidence that he shot 67% from the free throw line last year
238.0d
Thrillard45
Yeah he was throwing up so many bricks today.. Haven't watched him much before though, has his shot always looked like that? Or is it likely because of his wrist issue?
238.0d
gehrenberg
It's a horrendous looking jump shot. But I think he's hold as long as he plays this many minutes. It's just so much opportunity and he does some other things well. There's value if he can just make a couple more shots
238.0d
Thrillard45
Man he's averaging 35 min in his last 5 games, with 10+ shots a game... yet averaging 8 points a game. Hope he finds his shot in the new year
239.6d
Thrillard45
100% (1) agree 
Mysterious sore wrist just disclosed.. That explains the poor shooting. Says he injured it Nov 10.. That's over 40 days ago lol, and it's still sore. Weird.
241.1d
joshlloyd48
I don't believe he is a must-own player, but it depends on who you'd be adding for him. He was never going to shoot as well as last season, but also don't believe he will continue to shoot this poorly
241.1d
wackawacka
Well, what do the experts think? Come on. Are there any experts out there?
241.9d
Thrillard45
33% (3) agree 
Pretty underwhelming ever since he came back from his recent injury :\ Hold in standards?
242.0d
saintsintosea
100% (1) agree 
Seems like he was projected to do pretty well, but he's been a bit underwhelming lately despite having the playing time. How do we feel about him moving forward?
243.5d
stuntcrewsue
100% (15) agree 
Do I drop Richardson and pick up Gary Harris who is available in my league?
250.0d
Donnie99
100% (3) agree 
A still off with this threes tonight but if 26 is his minutes restriction, then I'm optimistic
250.1d
G00S3
100% (2) agree 
Do we know what his minutes restriction is set at? Either way, nice to see him back out there.
251.3d
funtasy
0% (3) agree 
Up: josh Richardson , down : demarre Carroll. 12 team league
252.5d
jw9nine
I'd say at this point in the season, depends on where you stand in your league and who is on the wire. More emphasis on the former.
252.6d
funtasy
50% (2) agree 
still worth owning in 12 team league?
255.4d
deadmau5whomp
40% (10) agree 
up for richardson, down for covington
266.4d
gehrenberg
33% (3) agree 
Personally I prefer Zeller, but it depends on your team needs. I think they have similar top 100 upside, but Zeller has played better so far
266.4d
mareshcj
100% (1) agree 
@Greg - do you believe there's a high probability he realizes potential? Losing faith and thinking of dropping for Cody Zeller/streamer. Not getting it done even with Winslow out.
267.1d
mareshcj
Think the Heat started holiday festivities a little early...
267.1d
rbmyers0153
0% (1) agree 
No its not, I'm very close to dropping him for a streamer in 12 team
267.1d
jw9nine
not the triple 1s you'd like
267.1d
rbmyers0153
100% (1) agree 
1/1 1.000 0/0 .000 0 0 0 0 0 1TO 2PTs first half
268.8d
TreborGrebtsev
100% (2) agree 
He'll be great if his shots start falling a bit more consistently. Nice to see him getting defensive stats.
269.0d
slambert87
100% (1) agree 
Decided to play him in place of Devin Booker today...
269.1d
jw9nine
100% (1) agree 
lots of 1s. 1/11 FG triple 1 and 1 asst ;)
269.1d
neocache
Oddest line I've seen in a while: 9% shooting with the triple 1.
272.5d
kylejdavidson
100% (2) agree 
He should probably have PG at this point too.
272.7d
Thrillard45
100% (2) agree 
Wow ESPN gave him SF eligibility too. Awesome bonus
275.1d
Nate_Swan
100% (10) agree 
Joshyyyyyyy Richoooo
275.4d
scottkdouglas
100% (1) agree 
From what I've seen, BBM projections are a sensible floor for most players. I've heard Josh speak on it before on pods that while the BBM projection is X, he see's the player potentially doing much better. One case being Smart. In this case Marvin is basically at his ceiling, high floor-low ceiling guy. J-Rich's projections are based off a lot of factors (including a FG% regression back to his college % if I remember correctly - something Josh mentioned on a pod in the summer), and has a lower floor. But if he was to continue his %'s from last yr & summer lg, along with the added bonus of higher usage w/Wade gone - and later in the yr potentially Dragic - then his counting stats could also improve a fair amount, giving him a higher ceiling than Marvin. Really depends on how much you a) want to wait to find out and b) believe that those factors will in fact help him make the jump.
275.4d
#36888
100% (3) agree 
You make sense and I don't think you should drop it. The original comment from Kyle still seems odd to me. There is a huge gap in the projections between Williams/Richardson. Position/team fit is not the question here. What are we supposed to rely on if not the protections? I think this is more a difference between a Josh & Cos. projections and Kyle's personal judgement. Just a difference in opinions? If looking at just the projections I can't see a sensible argument that Richardson is a superior choice over Williams.
275.4d
littledancerlena
100% (2) agree 
that makes sense if you picking between players of similar value, which isn't the case here if you accept the thesis that the difference between the 2 is the difference between 5th and 10th round. Maybe I don't think about right, but I have a hard time imaging I would draft a position in the 5th that was worth a 10th. And that seems pretty analogous here, unless the argument is that because we are dealing with FA, the pool is so constrained it can be worth it to reach 5 rounds worth of value for positional scarcity, which I doubt is true. But maybe it is. I fear I'm not articulating my question well enough, or asking something thats unreasonable, so I'll drop it.. Thanks for the thoughts.
275.5d
Donnie99
0% (3) agree 
Littledance, i think matt means by it is not a simple as a or b player is because you have to factor each team's situation.in your example, marvin and josh are two different type of players. Marvin is a big while josh is a guard, thus giving more guard stats.
275.6d
tylerabc
100% (3) agree 
I'm not sure I get all the hype behind Josh Richardson? I watched the Heat game last night, and even with him starting, he was hardly involved in the offense and didn't seem super confident when he did get chances. With Dragic out, they mostly have Winslow bringing the ball up the court. It's just making it hard to justify holding on to JR when there are other tempting options on the wire (Harris, Miles, Young, RHJ...)
275.7d
littledancerlena
100% (1) agree 
Fair. But also fair is that almost all the factors mentioned are theoretically captured in the projections, save team statistical need. There are columns for min max value (floor ceiling), short/long term (weekly projections), games played (total/replacement), etc. Let me ask it this way. Which tool or tools are the BEST way (or give us the best data) to decide whether to drop someone for a FA, my case of Marvin Williams for Josh Richardson is a great example. Maybe that's an unreasonable question. But having struggled for YEARS for to by systematic about making these tradeoffs decided it would be worth one more run. How do YOU GUYS use your tools to make those decisions? Maybe it all comes down to judgement.
275.9d
SmanSports
50% (6) agree 
@littledancerlena - I explain at the beginning of my waiver wire article why it is never as simple as adding Player A or Player B. There are so many factors that need to be taken into consideration.
276.0d
Thrillard45
100% (10) agree 
Would you rather have Josh Richardson (UP) or Sergio Rodriguez (DOWN)? 12team 9cat
276.3d
littledancerlena
100% (8) agree 
I get this reasoning. I really do. BUT, I guess I HAD BEEN assuming that the projections did some kind of probabilistic weighting (if not with math, then intuitively) of outcomes. that would mean that the expected outcome of Marvin was higher than the expected outcome of Josh (richardson, not Lloyd). If that's not the case, and it sounds like its not, that's fine I guess. But then, along the lines of the waiver wire piece, some kind of a list, with ordinal, even if not cardinal ranks, of potential free agents would be super useful. Again, I had THOUGHT that was imbedded in the rankings. And while I get that .3 is only the difference between 5th and 10th round, its also the difference between inside top 100 vs top 50 which is actually pretty significant when you think about who might fill an above league average starting spot. Anyway, long winded way of saying it would be extremely value to have a systematic way of understanding FA priority. (easier said than done)
276.3d
kylemckeown16
100% (2) agree 
#36888 -- Marvin's ceiling is much lower than Josh Richardson's, in my opinion. We give likely/probable projections here that are the work of Josh and Ken with input from the rest of the staff. When I give my opinion on the player comments, I'm largely doing that apart from the projections. When I look at J-Rich and Marvin, Marv is ranked 86th in 8-cat ROS projections and J-Rich is ranked 153, but Marv's league value is -0.14 and J-Rich's is -0.43. That 0.3 difference is the same difference between the 5th- and 10th-ranked players. Don't focus on the rankings of the players as much as the stats they produce and how that fits with your team build. I like Josh Richardson's potential on MIA much more than Marvin's capped potential on CHA. Also, seeing J-Rich start at PG with Dragic out is extremely interesting if the Heat decide to trade Dragic at some point.
276.3d
#36888
100% (1) agree 
Kyle - can you help me please understand a comment like that better. You have Marvin projected as Top 60 this season after a Top 50 performance last season. Richardson is barely projected at Top 140. Where is the disconnect?
276.3d
kylemckeown16
100% (1) agree 
littledancer -- I'll sign off on that. I'd rather have Josh Richardson than Marvin Williams the rest of the season.
276.4d
littledancerlena
50% (4) agree 
Drop Marvin Williams for Richardson ROS?
277.0d
cbishop1
100% (1) agree 
Would you rather have Michael KG or Josh Richardson? Kinda need MKGs rbds for my team but everyone keeps saying josh is MUST own lol. 10 team shallow league
277.4d
kylemckeown16
tc2000 - Do you have anyone else to drop? I'd want both players on my roster right now.
278.0d
currypig30
Thx! I was thinking about drop cj miles to add him as I have the impression that JR is more efficient in the long run. Maybe these two are very close.
278.0d
thparadox
Last years shooting was on 5 FGA per game and he shot most of his shots in the last 2 months when he was red hot -> 46% from three on the season. So you can expect regression and/or less efficiency with increase in volume of shots.
278.0d
joshlloyd48
100% (1) agree 
Because he shot a higher % on threes last season compared to twos and we don't believe he'll continue to be a 46% three point shooter
278.0d
currypig30
50% (2) agree 
Why he is projected to be 42% fg while he shoots over 45% last season.
281.5d
lewanddowski
100% (3) agree 
Richardson or Moe, better long term outlook?
284.5d
dishinNswishin
Is it worth dropping someone with perhaps temporary value for him such as Kilpatrick? Not sure what to make of him. He was pretty big down the stretch last season with a nice trickle of defensive stats but a lot of it was on some very fluky shooting and now he's coming back from injury and might not get to see what his real value is until he's 100%.
286.1d
Evil genius
0% (3) agree 
So you are saying since Richardson is back Winslow and Johnson suffer? SO neither is worth holding onto?
286.3d
DarkHorseFantasy
33% (3) agree 
don't think you drop dunn...drop James Ennis? Parsons back on Tuesday. Think I am dropping Jim now, but lmk if i messed up i guess. but i think dropping dunn is too much. He has a solid 2-4 weeks of rubio like numbers
286.3d
elbowslayer
100% (4) agree 
drop dunn for richardson? h2h 12 team
286.3d
joshlloyd48
100% (1) agree 
I think we'll see Richardson handling the ball quite a bit and that may cause Justise WInslow's high recent assist numbers to drop. They used Richardson as a PG in summer league with thoughts to have him be that same sort of guy, like Wade, this season.
286.5d
mikehubes
100% (1) agree 
I'm guessing he's on a minutes limit tonight. Any word as to how many he'll get? As for production, when up to speed he should be the Heat's #3 scoring option, and top 3-point shooter. I don't think 13+ ppg and closer to 2.0 3PM is out of the question. Might pick up some playmaking/ball handling duties as well. His ft% worries me though, but otherwise I see some good upside here.
286.6d
scoobydoo
100% (4) agree 
I wouldn't make that move. All Young does is 3PT and PTS. Richardson's upside is much, much higher. You've waited this long for Richardson, don't bail now.
286.6d
clankfu32
0% (6) agree 
Thoughts on dropping Richardson for Nick Young?
287.5d
jonas0014
Questionable? wow, finally...the end is near!
287.5d
Honkus
100% (1) agree 
Questionable for tomorrow night? Now this I can fap to.
287.5d
#39100
Is he worth stashing in standard league in general? Or just as a 3PT specialist?
289.6d
shmoey
Saw on twitter that he hasn't been participating in 5 on 5s yet.
315.2d
joshlloyd48
At this stage, it's looking like he's targeting opening night
315.2d
hegmanu
Projection is for 78 games... he won't miss more than 4 games with the MCL injury?
Per Game
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/g3/gr/ga/gs/gb/gfg%fga/gft%fta/gto/gUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
510.05Projection 16-17MIASubscribe now to view 2016-17 Projection
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/g3/gr/ga/gs/gb/gfg%fga/gft%fta/gto/gUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
119-0.22NBA 16-17MIA5330.510.21.43.22.61.20.8.3969.6.7791.51.216.6-0.800.11-0.96-0.200.360.19-1.30-0.040.61
120.80Last WeekMIA439.113.52.32.83.03.31.3.45511.01.0001.31.514.3-0.231.03-1.11-0.035.751.12-0.320.700.30
200.56Last 2 WeeksMIA737.013.12.43.03.32.11.6.43810.4.9171.71.415.0-0.301.22-1.010.102.911.73-0.610.580.38
390.21Last MonthMIA1534.311.71.92.63.01.61.5.4329.9.8001.71.315.0-0.540.61-1.17-0.031.521.53-0.680.050.57
83-0.08Last 2 MonthsMIA2529.69.01.23.02.51.41.0.3988.0.8141.70.914.2-1.00-0.12-1.01-0.260.900.73-1.060.110.96
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/g3/gr/ga/gs/gb/gfg%fga/gft%fta/gto/gUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
207-0.45NBA 15-16MIA5221.36.61.02.11.40.70.5.4525.2.6671.20.713.8-1.49-0.08-1.51-0.75-0.79-0.36-0.12-0.321.38
Per 36
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/363/36r/36a/36s/36b/36fg%fga/36ft%fta/36to/36USGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
83-0.12Projection 16-17MIASubscribe now to view 2016-17 Projection
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/363/36r/36a/36s/36b/36fg%fga/36ft%fta/36to/36USGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
189-0.26NBA 16-17MIA5330.512.01.73.73.11.40.9.39611.4.7791.71.416.6-1.120.13-0.91-0.220.12-0.13-1.060.070.75
610.18Last WeekMIA439.112.42.12.52.83.01.2.45510.11.0001.21.414.3-1.040.48-1.18-0.362.410.13-0.270.650.83
550.12Last 2 WeeksMIA737.012.82.42.93.22.11.5.43810.1.9171.71.415.0-0.970.74-1.09-0.181.140.51-0.460.570.82
89-0.05Last MonthMIA1534.312.32.02.73.11.71.5.43210.4.8001.71.315.0-1.060.38-1.14-0.200.570.52-0.540.140.89
125-0.15Last 2 MonthsMIA2529.611.01.53.73.01.71.3.3989.8.8142.11.114.2-1.32-0.06-0.92-0.250.540.24-0.900.201.12
RankValueNameTeamgm/gp/363/36r/36a/36s/36b/36fg%fga/36ft%fta/36to/36USGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
211-0.29NBA 15-16MIA5221.311.11.73.52.41.20.8.4528.8.6672.01.113.8-1.340.42-1.32-0.36-0.17-0.28-0.27-0.351.03
Totals
RankValueNameTeamgminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatoUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
510.05Projection 16-17MIASubscribe now to view 2016-17 Projection
RankValueNameTeamgminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatoUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
183-0.41NBA 16-17MIA531614:21539751671396140.396510.779776516.6-1.18-0.28-1.18-0.50-0.38-0.16-0.93-0.030.91
70.69Last WeekMIA4156:245491112135.455441.0005614.30.171.11-0.730.164.121.46-0.490.62-0.25
140.51Last 2 WeeksMIA7258:55921721231511.43873.917121015.0-0.101.13-0.790.142.531.74-0.600.500.02
310.22Last MonthMIA15514:221762839452422.432148.800251915.0-0.410.61-1.02-0.041.411.59-0.620.020.43
75-0.08Last 2 MonthsMIA25739:112253075623426.398201.814432314.2-0.94-0.09-0.99-0.310.780.79-0.960.090.96
RankValueNameTeamgminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatoUSGpV3VrVaVsVbVfg%Vft%VtoV
248-0.58NBA 15-16MIA521106:5434153107733625.452272.667633513.8-1.71-0.41-1.68-0.91-1.16-0.59-0.08-0.231.56

Game Log
DateOppSummaryStartValueTeamminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatopfUSGStatus
4/12/2017WASW 110 - 102Y-0.10MIA37:101532101.50012.00001215.0 
4/10/2017CLEW 124 - 121Y1.75MIA46:201926451.571141.00012215.3 
4/8/2017@ WASW 106 - 103Y1.39MIA36:361021352.33361.00041110.4 
4/7/2017@ TORL 94 - 96Y0.16MIA36:181022431.33312.00002316.3 
4/5/2017@ CHAW 112 - 99Y0.47MIA36:071946501.429141.00031422.3 
4/2/2017DENL 113 - 116Y0.73MIA37:331743113.54511.50021415.2 
3/31/2017NYKL 94 - 98Y-0.51MIA28:51201512.00041.00022010.5 
3/29/2017@ NYKW 105 - 88Y1.27MIA34:501731151.58312.00003020.0 
3/28/2017@ DETW 97 - 96Y-0.28MIA32:59915411.273111.00021417.9 
3/26/2017@ BOSL 108 - 112Y0.06MIA36:43911522.300101.00022214.2 
3/23/2017TORL 84 - 101Y-0.57MIA35:061212302.41712.33330416.7 
3/21/2017PHOW 112 - 97Y-0.28MIA35:581422201.46213.00001315.4 
3/19/2017PORL 104 - 115Y-0.34MIA32:351011211.5008.50021413.5 
3/17/2017MINW 123 - 105-0.31MIA31:30504303.2005.7504039.4 
3/15/2017NORW 120 - 112-0.36MIA15:46822200.7504.00001013.5 
3/12/2017@ INDL 98 - 102Y0.23MIA36:50908031.2867.83361312.2 
3/11/2017TORW 104 - 89-0.66MIA22:16303111.2504.50020210.8 
3/8/2017CHAW 108 - 101-0.58MIA25:07603020.25081.00021217.5 
3/6/2017@ CLEW 106 - 98-0.02MIA31:44502430.2504.7504038.2 
3/4/2017CLEW 120 - 92-0.27MIA25:03807301.4449.00000116.6 
3/3/2017@ ORLL 99 - 110-0.61MIA24:18713000.33331.00041310.3 
3/1/2017PHIW 125 - 98-0.06MIA24:11716511.3758.00001216.0 
2/27/2017@ DALL 89 - 96-0.98MIA7:56200000.5002.00000011.6 
2/25/2017INDW 113 - 95-0.86MIA14:17204100.3333.0000049.4 
2/24/2017@ ATLW 108 - 90-1.36MIA13:07000300.0005.00000215.7 
2/15/2017@ HOUW 117 - 109MIA               
2/13/2017ORLL 107 - 116MIA               
2/11/2017@ PHIL 109 - 117MIA               
2/10/2017@ BKNW 108 - 99MIA               
2/8/2017@ MILW 106 - 88MIA               
2/6/2017@ MINW 115 - 113MIA               
2/4/2017PHIW 125 - 102MIA               
2/1/2017ATLW 116 - 93MIA               
1/30/2017BKNW 104 - 96MIA               
1/28/2017DETW 116 - 103MIA               
1/27/2017@ CHIW 100 - 88MIA               
1/25/2017@ BKNW 109 - 106MIA               
1/23/2017GSWW 105 - 102MIA               
1/21/2017MILW 109 - 97MIA               
1/19/2017DALW 99 - 95MIA               
1/17/2017HOUW 109 - 103MIA               
1/13/2017@ MILL 108 - 116MIA               
1/10/2017@ GSWL 95 - 107MIA               
1/8/2017@ LACL 86 - 98MIA               
1/6/2017@ LALL 100 - 127Y-1.25MIA30:18611200.3336.50022312.4 
1/4/2017@ SACW 107 - 102Y-0.25MIA37:06918420.36411.00003117.4 
1/3/2017@ PHOL 90 - 99Y-0.38MIA36:521112322.31316.00003222.2 
1/1/2017DETL 98 - 107Y-0.34MIA37:461421820.38513.50042421.8 
12/30/2016@ BOSL 114 - 117Y1.46MIA34:331926842.471171.00013326.3 
12/29/2016@ CHAL 82 - 91Y0.69MIA33:102034211.571141.00011321.4 
12/27/2016OKCL 94 - 106Y0.70MIA37:282225310.563161.00020420.9 
12/23/2016@ NORL 87 - 91Y-0.79MIA32:55711310.25081.00022414.6 
12/22/2016LALW 115 - 107Y-0.66MIA36:30915301.36411.00002216.2 
12/20/2016ORLL 130 - 136Y-1.19MIA43:53924600.16712.75042415.8 
12/18/2016BOSL 95 - 105Y-0.85MIA34:31603010.30010.00000113.4 
12/16/2016LACL 98 - 102-0.76MIA29:36901201.273111.00030418.0 
12/14/2016INDW 95 - 89-0.57MIA30:291025300.5008.00003016.4 
12/12/2016WASW 112 - 101-0.15MIA29:031023310.5717.00002213.4 
12/10/2016@ CHIL 100 - 105-0.64MIA26:011103410.41712.50021323.2 
12/9/2016@ CLEL 84 - 114MIA               
12/7/2016@ ATLL 95 - 103MIA               
12/6/2016NYKL 103 - 114MIA               
12/3/2016@ PORL 92 - 99MIA               
12/1/2016@ UTAW 111 - 110MIA               
11/30/2016@ DENW 106 - 98MIA               
11/28/2016BOSL 104 - 112-0.05MIA28:461234020.4449.50021316.9 
11/26/2016MEML 107 - 110Y-0.27MIA29:241533500.417121.00022324.3 
11/25/2016@ MEMW 90 - 81Y0.24MIA26:541243410.4449.00000115.7 
11/23/2016@ DETL 84 - 107Y-0.94MIA20:06404100.4005.00001414.0 
11/21/2016@ PHIL 94 - 101Y-1.23MIA28:55412111.09111.50020117.1 
11/19/2016@ WASW 114 - 111Y0.22MIA34:041547111.5008.60051114.0 
11/17/2016MILW 96 - 73Y-0.55MIA32:201843100.36819.00001326.3 
11/15/2016ATLL 90 - 93Y0.94MIA38:051914223.571141.00023319.1 
11/14/2016@ SASL 90 - 94Y-0.78MIA28:16801410.4449.00003419.2 
11/12/2016UTAL 91 - 102Y-0.14MIA32:531203421.37516.00001325.1 
11/10/2016CHIL 95 - 98-0.02MIA28:241641001.46213.00000320.8 
11/7/2016@ OKCL 85 - 97-0.89MIA25:16714000.3758.00001316.3 
11/4/2016@ TORL 87 - 96-1.34MIA11:36001010.0004.00002222.4 
DateOppSummaryStartValueTeamminpts3rebaststlblkfg%fgaft%ftatopfUSGStatus
4/13/2016@ BOSL 88 - 98-1.17MIA26:57004101.0006.00000310.3 
4/12/2016@ DETW 99 - 93-0.35MIA37:16306112.3333.5002126.1 
4/10/2016ORLW 118 - 96-0.42MIA34:07913400.42971.00021112.3 
4/8/2016@ ORLL 109 - 1120.00MIA32:421325411.36411.75041116.3 
4/7/2016CHIW 106 - 98-0.42MIA32:181112100.44491.00020313.5 
4/5/2016DETW 107 - 890.30MIA35:291642000.6679.00000112.3 
4/2/2016@ PORL 93 - 110-0.22MIA30:131211420.50010.50022118.0 
4/1/2016@ SACW 112 - 106-0.78MIA27:33713101.3758.00002415.8 
3/30/2016@ LALL 100 - 102-1.51MIA29:21103310.0008.50021215.6 
3/28/2016BKNW 110 - 99Y0.89MIA38:141635321.6679.50021213.5 
3/25/2016ORLW 108 - 97-0.05MIA32:591432200.55691.00011313.9 
3/23/2016@ SASL 88 - 1121.18MIA34:121732431.53813.00000218.9 
3/22/2016@ NORW 113 - 99-1.12MIA24:25601000.3758.00001315.9 
3/19/2016CLEW 122 - 1010.61MIA32:041942211.6679.75042018.0 
3/17/2016CHAL 106 - 109-0.08MIA24:331834101.7789.25042524.4 
3/14/2016DENW 124 - 1191.22MIA32:451744223.60010.50021316.3 
3/12/2016@ TORL 104 - 112-0.48MIA26:26813020.4297.33330513.7 
3/11/2016@ CHIW 118 - 961.23MIA31:442242410.75012.00000316.8 
3/9/2016@ MILL 108 - 1140.79MIA24:221432221.6676.75040214.7 
3/6/2016PHIW 103 - 98-0.68MIA23:05710100.6005.00001211.7 
3/4/2016@ PHIW 112 - 102-0.46MIA33:21625301.2867.0000139.6 
3/3/2016PHOW 108 - 92-0.81MIA22:30612310.2867.50021418.0 
3/1/2016CHIW 129 - 1110.00MIA26:49913220.5717.00010412.9 
2/28/2016@ NYKW 98 - 810.09MIA30:15803220.50061.00020110.0 
2/27/2016@ BOSL 89 - 1010.20MIA26:501102122.7504.83363414.6 
2/24/2016GSWL 112 - 1180.67MIA28:371532011.83361.00021411.8 
2/22/2016INDW 101 - 93-0.80MIA8:33001010.0001.0000004.5 
2/20/2016WASW 114 - 94-0.14MIA35:14516303.2508.0000029.4 
2/19/2016@ ATLW 115 - 111-0.19MIA19:41711010.7504.0000028.3 
2/9/2016SASL 101 - 119MIA               
2/7/2016LACL 93 - 100MIA               
2/5/2016@ CHAW 98 - 95MIA               
2/3/2016@ DALW 93 - 90MIA               
2/2/2016@ HOUL 102 - 115-1.06MIA3:16001000.0001.00000114.0 
1/31/2016ATLW 105 - 87-1.01MIA1:11000000.0000.000000  
1/29/2016@ MILW 107 - 103MIA               
1/26/2016@ BKNW 102 - 98MIA               
1/25/2016@ CHIW 89 - 84MIA               
1/22/2016@ TORL 81 - 101-0.27MIA33:28602421.3339.00001514.4 
1/20/2016@ WASL 87 - 106-0.58MIA35:06603412.28671.00024316.8 
1/19/2016MILL 79 - 91-0.76MIA30:13302130.1258.50020313.9 
1/17/2016@ OKCL 74 - 99-0.91MIA19:48312000.2504.0000009.8 
1/15/2016@ DENW 98 - 95-1.10MIA10:26201000.2504.00000218.6 
1/13/2016@ LACL 90 - 104-0.69MIA3:18200201.00001.00021028.2 
1/11/2016@ GSWL 103 - 111-1.11MIA3:50000000.0001.00000011.1 
1/9/2016@ UTAL 83 - 98MIA               
1/8/2016@ PHOW 103 - 95MIA               
1/6/2016NYKL 90 - 98MIA               
1/4/2016INDW 103 - 100MIA               
1/3/2016@ WASW 97 - 75-1.28MIA3:43001100.0001.00002234.7 
1/1/2016DALW 106 - 82MIA               
12/29/2015@ MEML 90 - 99MIA               
12/28/2015BKNL 105 - 111MIA               
12/26/2015@ ORLW 108 - 101MIA               
12/25/2015NORW 94 - 88MIA               
12/22/2015DETL 92 - 93-0.79MIA14:02402200.25041.00020117.0 
12/20/2015PORW 116 - 109MIA               
12/18/2015TORL 94 - 108-0.82MIA3:26000001.0000.000002  
12/16/2015@ BKNW 104 - 98MIA               
12/14/2015@ ATLW 100 - 88MIA               
12/13/2015MEMW 100 - 97MIA               
12/11/2015@ INDL 83 - 96-1.20MIA8:45001000.0001.00001310.0 
12/9/2015@ CHAL 81 - 99-0.71MIA15:26512210.3333.50040214.6 
12/7/2015WASL 103 - 114-0.96MIA8:15001000.0000.000002  
12/5/2015CLEW 99 - 84-1.10MIA7:34001000.0000.0000126.2 
12/3/2015OKCW 97 - 95-1.05MIA8:20102000.0000.5002005.3 
11/30/2015BOSL 95 - 105MIA               
11/27/2015@ NYKW 97 - 78-0.76MIA1:48311000.5002.00000047.4 
11/25/2015@ DETL 81 - 104-1.01MIA5:39001100.0001.0000008.0 
11/23/2015NYKW 95 - 78MIA               
11/21/2015PHIW 96 - 91-1.24MIA4:24000000.0001.00001022.7 
11/19/2015SACW 116 - 109MIA               
11/17/2015MINL 91 - 103MIA               
11/12/2015UTAW 92 - 91Y-0.31MIA20:46823000.6005.00000411.0 
11/10/2015LALW 101 - 88-0.88MIA14:45100210.0001.5002015.6 
11/8/2015TORW 96 - 76MIA               
11/6/2015@ INDL 87 - 90MIA               
11/5/2015@ MINW 96 - 84-1.24MIA6:50000000.0001.00001213.3